That’s leet for Linux newb, or a Linux beginner.
The last time I installed Linux, five years ago, I learned: the newest thing is not the best thing. I built a computer with a 64-bit processor, after the 64 just came out on the market. I bought the processor for various reasons. So it came down to either lots of frustrations or buying a $20 academic Windows XP Operating System (OS). Yay for Windows.
This time, I installed Linux on hardware that is more common (Asus 1000 Netbook). To install Linux I think you need:
- an additional working computer with internet access next to you
- gusto and the ability to not worry about screwing something up* (CTYA)
- no project finish time expectations
*Don’t leave files you want on the same partition as the operating system. It makes it easier to install a different “distro,” or re-install after a big mess up.
Jerry recommended Mint over Ubuntu. I read that Mint is good for early [Windows] converts (me). It’s also “light,” or faster with user interfaces (me since I have a relatively small amount of memory), and built for media users (me). Me, me, and ME!
One thing I found neat is that you don’t need to have the image on a CD to install the OS anymore. UNetbootin allows you to write and install the OS from a USB. I installed Gloria, Linux Mint Version 7, using UNetbootin on a 2GB USB flash drive.
I had troubles which ended up being with the BIOS. But, another small victory puts me at conquering bigger problems in the future.
I don’t know if I would recommend Linux over another broad type of OS. Personally, I like the advantages: independence from corporations as well as the interactions in the open sourcing community. But, there are drawbacks, so it isn’t for everyone.
I find working on computers less enjoyable than my recent hardware adventures. To me, there is something more enjoyable about physical project evidence over the digital enhancement.



Rooster said,
September 22, 2009 @ 6:49 am
|337 :$ 1J/-\]V[|=-